From 2ff21717a8a11bb237f4a510777db88b202960a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oleg Proskurin Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 19:44:03 +0700 Subject: [PATCH] feat: init the article - vibecoding --- ...coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding.md | 46 ++ 0-inbox/beyond-vibe-coding.md | 55 +++ .../log-chat.md | 20 + .../outline.md | 3 + .../perplexity-terminology-research.md | 423 ++++++++++++++++++ .../research-index.md | 79 ++++ .../seo-metadata.md | 16 + .../text.md | 3 + assets/beyond-vibe-coding/interview.md | 74 +++ assets/beyond-vibe-coding/log-chat.md | 20 + assets/beyond-vibe-coding/outline.md | 3 + assets/beyond-vibe-coding/research-index.md | 166 +++++++ assets/beyond-vibe-coding/seo-metadata.md | 16 + assets/beyond-vibe-coding/text.md | 3 + 14 files changed, 927 insertions(+) create mode 100644 0-inbox/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding.md create mode 100644 0-inbox/beyond-vibe-coding.md create mode 100644 assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/log-chat.md create mode 100644 assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/outline.md create mode 100644 assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/perplexity-terminology-research.md create mode 100644 assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/research-index.md create mode 100644 assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/seo-metadata.md create mode 100644 assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/text.md create mode 100644 assets/beyond-vibe-coding/interview.md create mode 100644 assets/beyond-vibe-coding/log-chat.md create mode 100644 assets/beyond-vibe-coding/outline.md create mode 100644 assets/beyond-vibe-coding/research-index.md create mode 100644 assets/beyond-vibe-coding/seo-metadata.md create mode 100644 assets/beyond-vibe-coding/text.md diff --git a/0-inbox/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding.md b/0-inbox/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c293bc9 --- /dev/null +++ b/0-inbox/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +--- +slug: ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding +title: "AI Coding Methodologies: Beyond Vibe Coding" +author: henry-technical +status: inbox +created: 2025-01-22 +updated: 2025-01-22 +content_type: explainer +primary_keyword: "" +secondary_keywords: [] +assets_folder: assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/ +--- + +# Idea + +**Source:** Perplexity research on AI-assisted development terminology (Jan 2025) + +**Concept:** Overview article covering AI coding methodologies landscape. Position vibe coding as casual/risky approach, contrast with professional techniques (Spec-Driven Development, AI-DLC, Agentic Coding, etc.). + +**Goal:** Establish Henry's expertise in AI-assisted development space. Warm-up article for Dev.to account. + +**Angle:** "Wide view" — Henry surveys the field and shares his practical preferences. + +--- + +# Brief + +*pending @strategist* + +--- + +# Outline + +See [outline.md](assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/outline.md) + +# Draft + +See [text.md](assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/text.md) + +# SEO + +See [seo-metadata.md](assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/seo-metadata.md) + +# Activity Log + +See [log-chat.md](assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/log-chat.md) diff --git a/0-inbox/beyond-vibe-coding.md b/0-inbox/beyond-vibe-coding.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f48a745 --- /dev/null +++ b/0-inbox/beyond-vibe-coding.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +--- +slug: beyond-vibe-coding +title: "Beyond Vibe Coding: Professional AI Development Methodologies" +author: henry-technical +status: inbox +created: 2026-01-22 +updated: 2026-01-22 +content_type: explainer +primary_keyword: "" +secondary_keywords: [] +assets_folder: assets/beyond-vibe-coding/ +--- + +# Idea + +**Source:** Perplexity research on AI-assisted development terminology (Jan 2026) + +**Concept:** Overview article covering AI coding methodologies landscape. Position vibe coding (Collins Word of Year 2025) as entry point, then survey professional approaches: Spec-Driven Development, Agentic Coding, AI Pair Programming, HITL, TDD+AI. + +**Goal:** Establish Henry's expertise in AI-assisted development. Second article for Dev.to account warmup. + +**Angle:** Survey + practitioner perspective (via interview with Oleg) + +--- + +# Brief + +*pending @strategist* + +--- + +# Assets Index + +All working files for this article: + +| File | Purpose | +|------|---------| +| [outline.md](assets/beyond-vibe-coding/outline.md) | Article structure (pending) | +| [text.md](assets/beyond-vibe-coding/text.md) | Article draft (pending) | +| [seo-metadata.md](assets/beyond-vibe-coding/seo-metadata.md) | SEO title, description, keywords | +| [log-chat.md](assets/beyond-vibe-coding/log-chat.md) | Activity log and agent comments | +| [research-index.md](assets/beyond-vibe-coding/research-index.md) | Methodology clusters, verified sources, interview questions | +| [interview.md](assets/beyond-vibe-coding/interview.md) | Oleg's answers — source for Henry's voice | + +## External Research + +| File | Purpose | +|------|---------| +| [perplexity-chats/AI-Assisted Development_...](research/perplexity-chats/) | Original Perplexity research on terminology | + +--- + +# Activity Log + +See [log-chat.md](assets/beyond-vibe-coding/log-chat.md) diff --git a/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/log-chat.md b/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/log-chat.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8eed3f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/log-chat.md @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +# Activity Log + +## 2025-01-22 @strategist + +**Action:** Initial setup, research intake + +**Changes:** +- Created article card in `0-inbox/` +- Created assets folder structure +- Copied Perplexity research to `perplexity-terminology-research.md` +- Created `research-index.md` for methodology clustering + +**Notes:** +- Goal: warm-up article for Henry's Dev.to account +- Approach: survey + personal opinion through interview with Oleg +- Need to verify all source links before using + +**For next agent:** @strategist continues with research clustering and interview + +--- diff --git a/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/outline.md b/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/outline.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..65847d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/outline.md @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +# Outline + +*pending — will be created after research clustering and interview* diff --git a/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/perplexity-terminology-research.md b/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/perplexity-terminology-research.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dd8590d --- /dev/null +++ b/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/perplexity-terminology-research.md @@ -0,0 +1,423 @@ +# AI-Assisted Development: Кластеризованная терминология и подходы + +**Source:** Perplexity Research, January 2026 +**Original file:** `/research/perplexity-chats/AI-Assisted Development_ Кластеризованная терминол.md` + +--- + +## Domain 1: Experimental & Low-Quality Approaches + +### Vibe Coding + +**Authority Rank: 1** | **Perception: Negative** + +**Sources:** +1. **Andrej Karpathy** (OpenAI co-founder, Tesla AI Director) — Wikipedia, Feb 2025 +2. **Collins English Dictionary** — Word of the Year 2025 +3. **SonarSource** (Code Quality Platform) — code quality analysis + +**Description:** +Term coined by Andrej Karpathy in February 2025, quickly became cultural phenomenon — Collins English Dictionary named it Word of Year 2025. Approach where developer describes task in natural language, AI generates code, but key distinction: **developer does NOT review code**, only looks at execution results. + +Simon Willison quote: "If LLM wrote every line of your code, but you reviewed, tested and understood it all — that's not vibe coding, that's using LLM as typing assistant". Key characteristic: accepting AI-generated code without understanding it. + +Critics point to lack of accountability, maintainability problems, increased security vulnerability risk. May 2025: Swedish app Lovable (using vibe coding) had security vulnerabilities in 170 of 1,645 created web apps. Fast Company September 2025 reported "vibe coding hangover" — senior engineers cite "development hell" working with such code. + +Suitable for "throwaway weekend projects" as Karpathy originally intended, but risky for production systems. + +**Links:** +- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibe_coding +- https://www.sonarsource.com/resources/library/vibe-coding/ + +--- + +## Domain 2: Enterprise & Production-Grade Methodologies + +### AI-Driven Development Life Cycle (AI-DLC) + +**Authority Rank: 1** | **Perception: Positive - Enterprise** + +**Sources:** +1. **AWS** — Raja SP, Principal Solutions Architect, July 2025 +2. **Amazon Q Developer & Kiro** — official AWS platform + +**Description:** +Presented by AWS July 2025 as transformative enterprise methodology. Raja SP created AI-DLC with team after working with 100+ large customers. + +AI as **central collaborator** throughout SDLC with two dimensions: +1. **AI-Powered Execution with Human Oversight** — AI creates detailed work plans, actively requests clarifications, defers critical decisions to humans +2. **Dynamic Team Collaboration** — while AI handles routine tasks, teams unite for real-time problem solving + +**Three phases:** Inception (Mob Elaboration), Construction (Mob Construction), Operations + +**Terminology:** "sprints" → "bolts" (hours/days instead of weeks); Epics → Units of Work + +**Link:** https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/devops/ai-driven-development-life-cycle/ + +### Spec-Driven Development (SDD) + +**Authority Rank: 2** | **Perception: Positive - Systematic** + +**Sources:** +1. **GitHub Engineering** — Den Delimarsky, Spec Kit toolkit, September 2025 +2. **ThoughtWorks Technology Radar** — November 2025 +3. **Red Hat Developers** — October 2025 + +**Description:** +Emerged 2025 as direct response to "vibe coding" problems. ThoughtWorks included in Technology Radar. GitHub open-sourced Spec Kit September 2025, supports Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI. + +**Key principle:** specification becomes source of truth, not code. + +**Spec Kit Workflow:** +1. **Constitution** — immutable high-level principles (rules file) +2. **/specify** — create specification from high-level prompt +3. **/plan** — technical planning based on specification +4. **/tasks** — break down into manageable phased parts + +**Three interpretations:** Spec-first, Spec-anchored, Spec-as-source + +**Tools:** Amazon Kiro, GitHub Spec Kit, Tessl Framework + +**Links:** +- https://github.blog/ai-and-ml/generative-ai/spec-driven-development-with-ai-get-started-with-a-new-open-source-toolkit/ +- https://www.thoughtworks.com/radar/techniques/spec-driven-development +- https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/sdd-3-tools.html +- https://developer.microsoft.com/blog/spec-driven-development-spec-kit + +### Architecture-First AI Development + +**Authority Rank: 3** | **Perception: Positive - Professional/Mature** + +**Sources:** +1. **WaveMaker** — Vikram Srivats (CCO), Prashant Reddy (Head of AI Product Engineering), January 2026 +2. **ITBrief Industry Analysis** — January 2026 + +**Description:** +2026 industry shift. Quote Vikram Srivats: "Second coming of AI coding tools must be all about **Architectural Intelligence** — just Artificial Intelligence no longer fits." + +Shift from "vibe coding" experiments to governance, architecture alignment, long-term maintainability. + +**Key characteristics:** +- System design before implementation +- AI agents with clear roles: Architect, Builder, Guardian +- Coding architectural rules, enforcement review processes +- Working from formal specifications +- Respect for internal organizational standards + +**Links:** +- https://itbrief.co.uk/story/ai-coding-tools-face-2026-reset-towards-architecture +- https://itbrief.news/story/ai-coding-tools-face-2026-reset-towards-architecture + +--- + +## Domain 3: Quality & Validation-Focused Approaches + +### Test-Driven Development with AI (TDD-AI) + +**Authority Rank: 1** | **Perception: Positive - Quality-Focused** + +**Sources:** +1. **Galileo AI Research** — August 2025 +2. **Builder.io Engineering** — August 2025 + +**Description:** +Traditional TDD adapted for AI systems. Tests written first → AI generates code to pass tests → verify → refactor. + +Statistical testing for non-deterministic AI outputs — critical distinction from traditional TDD. + +**Links:** +- https://galileo.ai/blog/tdd-ai-system-architecture +- https://galileo.ai/blog/test-driven-development-ai-systems +- https://www.builder.io/blog/test-driven-development-ai + +### Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) AI Development + +**Authority Rank: 2** | **Perception: Positive - Responsible** + +**Sources:** +1. **Google Cloud Documentation** — 2026 +2. **Encord Research** — December 2024 +3. **Atlassian Engineering** — HULA framework, September 2025 + +**Description:** +Humans actively involved in AI system lifecycle. Continuous feedback and validation loops. Hybrid approach: human judgment + AI execution. + +**HULA (Human-in-the-Loop AI)** — Atlassian framework for software development agents. + +**Links:** +- https://cloud.google.com/discover/human-in-the-loop +- https://encord.com/blog/human-in-the-loop-ai/ +- https://www.atlassian.com/blog/atlassian-engineering/hula-blog-autodev-paper-human-in-the-loop-software-development-agents + +### Quality-First AI Coding + +**Authority Rank: 3** | **Perception: Positive - Professional** + +**Sources:** +1. **Qodo.ai** (formerly CodiumAI) — December 2025 + +**Description:** +Code integrity at core. Qodo.ai — platform with agentic AI code generation and comprehensive testing. + +Production-ready focus: automatic test generation for every code change. Direct contrast to "vibe coding" — quality non-negotiable. + +**Link:** https://www.qodo.ai/ai-code-review-platform/ + +### Deterministic AI Development + +**Authority Rank: 4** | **Perception: Positive - Enterprise/Compliance** + +**Source:** Augment Code Research — August 2025 + +**Description:** +Identical outputs for identical inputs. Rule-based architectures for predictability. Best for: security scanning, compliance checks, refactoring tasks. + +Hybrid approach: probabilistic reasoning + deterministic execution. + +**Link:** https://www.augmentcode.com/guides/deterministic-ai-for-predictable-coding + +--- + +## Domain 4: Collaborative Development Patterns + +### AI Pair Programming + +**Authority Rank: 1** | **Perception: Positive - Collaborative** + +**Sources:** +1. **GitHub Copilot (Microsoft)** — January 2026 +2. **Qodo.ai Documentation** — March 2025 +3. **GeeksforGeeks** — July 2025 + +**Description:** +AI as "pair programmer" or coding partner. Based on traditional pair programming: driver (human/AI) and navigator (human/AI) roles. + +Real-time collaboration and feedback. Tools: GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf. + +**Links:** +- https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/overview +- https://www.qodo.ai/glossary/pair-programming/ +- https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/artificial-intelligence/what-is-ai-pair-programming/ +- https://graphite.com/guides/ai-pair-programming-best-practices + +### Mobbing with AI / Mob Programming with AI + +**Authority Rank: 2** | **Perception: Positive - Team-Focused** + +**Sources:** +1. **Atlassian Engineering Blog** — December 2025 +2. **Aaron Griffith** — January 2025 (YouTube) + +**Description:** +Entire team works together, AI as driver. AI generates code/tests in front of team. Team navigates, reviews, refines in real-time. + +Best for: complex problems, knowledge transfer, quality assurance. + +**Links:** +- https://www.atlassian.com/blog/atlassian-engineering/mobbing-with-ai +- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsFPbYX4WXQ + +### Agentic Coding / Agentic Programming + +**Authority Rank: 3** | **Perception: Positive - Advanced** + +**Sources:** +1. **arXiv Research Paper** — August 2025 +2. **AI Accelerator Institute** — February 2025 +3. **Apiiro Security Platform** — September 2025 + +**Description:** +LLM-based agents autonomously plan, execute, improve development tasks. Beyond code completion: generates programs, diagnoses bugs, writes tests, refactors. + +Key properties: **autonomy, interactive, iterative refinement, goal-oriented**. + +Agent behaviors: planning, memory management, tool integration, execution monitoring. + +**Links:** +- https://arxiv.org/html/2508.11126v1 +- https://www.aiacceleratorinstitute.com/agentic-code-generation-the-future-of-software-development/ +- https://apiiro.com/glossary/agentic-coding/ + +--- + +## Domain 5: Workflow & Process Integration + +### Prompt-Driven Development (PDD) + +**Authority Rank: 1** | **Perception: Neutral to Positive** + +**Sources:** +1. **Capgemini Software Engineering** — May 2025 +2. **Hexaware Technologies** — August 2025 + +**Description:** +Developer breaks requirements into series of prompts. LLM generates code for each prompt. **Critical:** developer MUST review LLM-generated code. + +Critical distinction from vibe coding: code review mandatory. + +**Links:** +- https://capgemini.github.io/ai/prompt-driven-development/ +- https://hexaware.com/blogs/prompt-driven-development-coding-in-conversation/ + +### AI-Augmented Development + +**Authority Rank: 2** | **Perception: Positive - Practical** + +**Sources:** +1. **GitLab Official Documentation** — December 2023 +2. **Virtusa** — January 2024 + +**Description:** +AI tools accelerate SDLC across all phases. Focus: code generation, bug detection, automated testing, smart documentation. + +Key principle: humans handle strategy, AI handles execution. + +**Links:** +- https://about.gitlab.com/topics/agentic-ai/ai-augmented-software-development/ +- https://www.virtusa.com/digital-themes/ai-augmented-development + +### Copilot-Driven Development + +**Authority Rank: 3** | **Perception: Positive - Practical** + +**Sources:** +1. **GitHub/Microsoft Official** — January 2026 +2. **Emergn** — September 2025 + +**Description:** +Specifically using GitHub Copilot or similar tools as development partner (not just assistant). + +Context-aware, learns coding style. Enables conceptual focus instead of mechanical typing. + +**Links:** +- https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/overview +- https://www.emergn.com/insights/how-ai-tools-impact-the-way-we-develop-software-our-github-copilot-journey/ + +### Conversational Coding + +**Authority Rank: 4** | **Perception: Neutral to Positive** + +**Sources:** +1. **Google Cloud Platform** — January 2026 +2. **arXiv Research** — March 2025 + +**Description:** +Natural language interaction with AI for development. Iterative, dialogue-based approach. Context retention across sessions. + +**Links:** +- https://cloud.google.com/conversational-ai +- https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16508 + +--- + +## Domain 6: Code Review & Maintenance + +### AI Code Review + +**Authority Rank: 1** | **Perception: Neutral to Positive** + +**Sources:** +1. **LinearB** — March 2024 +2. **Swimm.io** — November 2025 +3. **CodeAnt.ai** — May 2025 + +**Description:** +Automated code examination using ML/LLM. Static and dynamic analysis. Identifies bugs, security issues, performance problems, code smells. + +Tools: Qodo, CodeRabbit, SonarQube AI features. + +**Links:** +- https://linearb.io/blog/ai-code-review +- https://swimm.io/learn/ai-tools-for-developers/ai-code-review-how-it-works-and-3-tools-you-should-know +- https://www.codeant.ai/blogs/ai-vs-traditional-code-review + +--- + +## Domain 7: Specialized & Emerging Approaches + +### Ensemble Programming/Prompting with AI + +**Authority Rank: 1** | **Perception: Positive - Advanced** + +**Sources:** +1. **Kinde.com** — November 2024 +2. **Ultralytics ML Research** — December 2025 +3. **arXiv** — June 2025 + +**Description:** +Multiple AI models/prompts combined for better results. Aggregation methods: voting, averaging, weighted scoring. + +**Links:** +- https://kinde.com/learn/ai-for-software-engineering/prompting/ensemble-prompting-that-actually-moves-the-needle/ +- https://www.ultralytics.com/blog/exploring-ensemble-learning-and-its-role-in-ai-and-ml + +### Prompt Engineering for Development + +**Authority Rank: 2** | **Perception: Neutral to Positive** + +**Sources:** +1. **Google Cloud** — January 2026 +2. **OpenAI** — April 2025 +3. **GitHub** — May 2024 + +**Description:** +Crafting effective prompts for AI models. Critical skill for AI-assisted development. + +Techniques: few-shot learning, chain-of-thought, role prompting. + +**Links:** +- https://cloud.google.com/discover/what-is-prompt-engineering +- https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/prompt-engineering +- https://github.blog/ai-and-ml/generative-ai/prompt-engineering-guide-generative-ai-llms/ + +### Intentional AI Development + +**Authority Rank: 3** | **Perception: Positive - Thoughtful** + +**Sources:** +1. **Tech.eu** — January 2026 +2. **ghuntley.com** — August 2025 + +**Description:** +Purpose-driven AI design. Clear roles and boundaries for AI. Deliberate practice and learning approach. + +**Links:** +- https://tech.eu/2026/01/05/adopting-an-intentional-ai-strategy-in-2026/ +- https://ghuntley.com/play/ + +--- + +## Domain 8: General & Cross-Cutting Terms + +### AI-Assisted Coding / AI-Assisted Development + +**Authority Rank: 1** | **Perception: Neutral to Positive** + +**Sources:** +1. **Wikipedia** — July 2025 +2. **GitLab** — 2025 + +**Description:** +Broad umbrella term for AI enhancing software development tasks. Includes code completion, documentation generation, testing, debugging assistance. + +Developer remains in control, reviews all suggestions. Most common adoption pattern globally. + +**Links:** +- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI-assisted_software_development +- https://about.gitlab.com/topics/devops/ai-code-generation-guide/ + +--- + +## Key Takeaways + +**Domain 1** (Experimental): Only Vibe Coding — only term with explicitly negative connotation, backed by high-authority sources (OpenAI founder, Collins Dictionary). + +**Domain 2** (Enterprise): Most authoritative domain with AWS, GitHub Engineering, ThoughtWorks as sources. Focus on production-grade, governance, architecture. + +**Domain 3** (Quality): Research-heavy domain (Galileo AI, Google Cloud, Atlassian) with emphasis on responsible development. + +**Domain 4** (Collaborative): Practical patterns, backed by major platforms (Microsoft/GitHub, Atlassian) and research (arXiv). + +**Domains 5-7**: Workflow integration, code review, specialized techniques — more narrow but important practices. + +**Domain 8**: General term serving as baseline for all other approaches. diff --git a/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/research-index.md b/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/research-index.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..47dbeaf --- /dev/null +++ b/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/research-index.md @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ +# Research Index + +Working file for methodology clustering and validation. + +## Source +- `perplexity-terminology-research.md` — original Perplexity research (Jan 2025) + +--- + +## Methodology Clusters + +### Tier 1: Must Include (High Authority + High Relevance) + +| Term | Source Authority | Link Status | Include? | +|------|------------------|-------------|----------| +| Vibe Coding | Wikipedia, Collins Dictionary, Andrej Karpathy | ⏳ verify | | +| Spec-Driven Development | GitHub, ThoughtWorks, Martin Fowler | ⏳ verify | | +| AI-Driven Development Life Cycle | AWS | ⏳ verify | | +| Agentic Coding | arXiv, AI Accelerator Institute | ⏳ verify | | +| AI Pair Programming | GitHub/Microsoft, GeeksforGeeks | ⏳ verify | | + +### Tier 2: Consider (Good Authority) + +| Term | Source Authority | Link Status | Include? | +|------|------------------|-------------|----------| +| Architecture-First AI Development | WaveMaker, ITBrief | ⏳ verify | | +| Test-Driven Development with AI | Galileo AI, Builder.io | ⏳ verify | | +| Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) | Google Cloud, Atlassian | ⏳ verify | | +| Prompt-Driven Development | Capgemini, Hexaware | ⏳ verify | | +| Quality-First AI Coding | Qodo.ai | ⏳ verify | | + +### Tier 3: Maybe (Lower Authority / Niche) + +| Term | Source Authority | Link Status | Include? | +|------|------------------|-------------|----------| +| Mobbing with AI | Atlassian | ⏳ verify | | +| Copilot-Driven Development | Microsoft/GitHub | ⏳ verify | | +| Conversational Coding | Google Cloud, arXiv | ⏳ verify | | +| Deterministic AI Development | Augment Code | ⏳ verify | | +| Ensemble Programming | Kinde.com, Ultralytics | ⏳ verify | | + +### Tier 4: Skip (Generic / Low Value) + +- AI-Assisted Coding — too generic, umbrella term +- AI-Augmented Development — too generic +- Prompt Engineering — separate skill, not methodology +- AI Code Review — tool category, not methodology + +--- + +## Interview Questions Bank + +*Questions to ask Oleg about each methodology* + +1. Vibe Coding — "Ты когда-нибудь так работал? Результат?" +2. Spec-Driven — "Пробовал писать spec перед кодом с AI?" +3. Agentic — "Как используешь Claude Code в agentic режиме?" +4. TDD-AI — "Тесты сначала с AI — работает?" +5. HITL — "Как часто AI делает что-то без твоего OK?" + +--- + +## Henry's Opinions (from interview) + +*Will be filled during interview* + +--- + +## Link Verification Log + +*Track which links checked and status* + +| Link | Status | Notes | +|------|--------|-------| +| | | | + +--- + +*Updated: 2025-01-22* diff --git a/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/seo-metadata.md b/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/seo-metadata.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c901395 --- /dev/null +++ b/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/seo-metadata.md @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +# SEO Metadata + +*pending — will be created after keyword research (step 5)* + +## Title +[TBD] + +## Meta Description +[TBD] + +## Target Keywords +- Primary: [TBD] +- Secondary: [TBD] + +## URL Slug +ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding diff --git a/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/text.md b/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/text.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..331baa2 --- /dev/null +++ b/assets/ai-coding-methodologies-beyond-vibe-coding/text.md @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +# Article Text + +*pending — will be written after outline approval* diff --git a/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/interview.md b/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/interview.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4924a08 --- /dev/null +++ b/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/interview.md @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ +# Interview Notes + +Записи ответов Олега на вопросы по методологиям AI-разработки. +Используется для создания голоса Henry в статье. + +--- + +## Vibe Coding + +**Вопрос:** Ты когда-нибудь работал в режиме vibe coding? Что получилось? Когда это уместно, когда нет? + +**Ответ:** + +Термину меньше года, а он уже стал практически синонимом AI-разработки. Наверное потому что удобно звучит — "vibe coding", "я навайбкодил". Но в этом и проблема: vibe coding сохраняет негативные коннотации (недостаточно профессионально, ненадёжно, абы-как), и при этом обобщает весь AI-кодинг, перенося этот негатив на всё поле. Поэтому и пишу эту статью — давайте разберём где vibe coding, а где другие подходы. + +**Когда использую:** Dev tools не попадающие в прод, прототипы, эксперименты, side projects. Надо признать — во многих случаях работает неплохо. + +**Но не чистый vibe:** Обычно всё равно проверяю изменения — хотя бы быстро просматриваю git diff перед коммитом. Если задача большая — прошу агента коммитить небольшими порциями, потом просматриваю. + +**Хорошие практики даже при vibe coding:** +1. Покрывать код тестами и проверять что проходят (+ typecheck, lint, prettier) +2. Просить другого AI агента сделать ревью проделанной работы +3. Человеческое внимание для важных вещей — если что-то критично, лучше убедиться самостоятельно + +Не говорю что нужно всегда досконально проверять если код работает, но минимальный контроль — да. + +--- + +## Spec-Driven Development + +**Вопрос:** Пробовал GitHub Spec Kit или писать spec перед кодом? Это будущее или overkill? + +**Ответ:** +[pending] + +--- + +## Agentic Coding + +**Вопрос:** Как используешь Claude Code? Даёшь автономию или контролируешь каждый шаг? Что доверяешь агенту, что нет? + +**Ответ:** +[pending] + +--- + +## AI Pair Programming + +**Вопрос:** Copilot/Cursor — как pair programmer или просто autocomplete? Реально ли это "парное программирование"? + +**Ответ:** +[pending] + +--- + +## Human-in-the-Loop + +**Вопрос:** Как часто AI делает что-то без твоего одобрения? Где граница доверия? + +**Ответ:** +[pending] + +--- + +## TDD + AI + +**Вопрос:** Пишешь тесты первыми при работе с AI? Работает ли классический TDD с генеративным AI? + +**Ответ:** +[pending] + +--- + +*Created: 2026-01-22* diff --git a/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/log-chat.md b/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/log-chat.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f53e294 --- /dev/null +++ b/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/log-chat.md @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +# Activity Log + +## 2026-01-22 @strategist + +**Action:** Initial setup + +**Changes:** +- Created article card in `0-inbox/beyond-vibe-coding.md` +- Created assets folder structure +- Copied Perplexity research +- Created research-index.md for clustering + +**Notes:** +- Goal: Henry's 2nd Dev.to article for account warmup +- Approach: methodology survey + practitioner opinion via interview +- Interview planned to capture authentic perspective + +**Next:** Verify sources, cluster methodologies, conduct interview + +--- diff --git a/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/outline.md b/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/outline.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..65847d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/outline.md @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +# Outline + +*pending — will be created after research clustering and interview* diff --git a/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/research-index.md b/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/research-index.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9adb9e4 --- /dev/null +++ b/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/research-index.md @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ +# Research Index + +Working file for methodology clustering and source verification. + +## Source +- `perplexity-terminology-research.md` — original Perplexity research (Jan 2025) + +--- + +## Methodology Selection + +Based on research, selecting approaches for article coverage. + +### Tier 1: MUST Include (High Authority + Reader Interest) + +| Term | Why Include | Source Authority | Status | +|------|-------------|------------------|--------| +| **Vibe Coding** | Hook — Collins Word of Year 2025, everyone knows it | Wikipedia, Collins, Karpathy | ✅ verified | +| **Spec-Driven Development** | Direct contrast to vibe coding, GitHub Spec Kit | GitHub, ThoughtWorks, Martin Fowler | ✅ verified | +| **Agentic Coding** | Hot topic, Claude Code users care about this | arXiv surveys (Aug 2025, Dec 2025) | ✅ verified | + +### Tier 2: SHOULD Include (Good Authority, Practical) + +| Term | Why Include | Source Authority | Status | +|------|-------------|------------------|--------| +| **AI Pair Programming** | Relatable, Copilot users know this | GitHub official, Microsoft | ✅ verified | +| **Human-in-the-Loop (HITL)** | Important concept, enterprise backing | Atlassian HULA, Google Cloud | ✅ verified | +| **TDD + AI** | Quality angle, contrasts vibe coding | Qodo.ai, Builder.io, GitHub Blog | ✅ verified | + +### Tier 3: MENTION Briefly (Context/Completeness) + +| Term | Why | Status | +|------|-----|--------| +| AI-DLC (AWS) | Enterprise angle, shows maturity | ⏳ verify if needed | +| Architecture-First | 2026 trend prediction | ⏳ verify if needed | +| Prompt-Driven Development | Clarify difference from vibe coding | ⏳ verify if needed | + +### Tier 4: SKIP (Generic/Low Value for This Article) + +- AI-Assisted Coding — umbrella term, too generic +- AI-Augmented Development — same, no distinct methodology +- Copilot-Driven Development — subset of AI Pair Programming +- Conversational Coding — too vague +- Ensemble Programming — too niche +- Deterministic AI Development — enterprise-specific, niche + +--- + +## Article Angle + +**Narrative arc:** +1. Vibe coding = entry point (hot topic, word of year) +2. Problem: works for prototypes, fails for production +3. Survey: what professionals actually use +4. Each methodology = one section with: + - What it is (1-2 sentences) + - When to use + - Henry's take (from interview) +5. Conclusion: spectrum from vibe → spec-driven, choose based on stakes + +--- + +## Verified Sources + +### Vibe Coding +| Source | URL | Notes | +|--------|-----|-------| +| Wikipedia | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibe_coding | Comprehensive, cites Karpathy | +| Collins Dictionary | collinsdictionary.com | Word of Year 2025 | +| Andrej Karpathy | X/Twitter Feb 2025 | Original coiner | + +### Spec-Driven Development +| Source | URL | Notes | +|--------|-----|-------| +| GitHub Spec Kit | github.com/github/spec-kit | Official repo | +| ThoughtWorks Radar | thoughtworks.com/radar | SDD in techniques | +| Martin Fowler | martinfowler.com | SDD tools analysis | + +### Agentic Coding +| Source | URL | Notes | +|--------|-----|-------| +| arXiv 2508.11126 | arxiv.org/abs/2508.11126 | "AI Agentic Programming" survey (Aug 2025) | +| arXiv 2512.07921 | arxiv.org/abs/2512.07921 | "DeepCode: Open Agentic Coding" (Dec 2025) | +| arXiv 2512.14012 | arxiv.org/html/2512.14012 | "Professional Developers Don't Vibe, They Control" | + +### AI Pair Programming +| Source | URL | Notes | +|--------|-----|-------| +| GitHub Features | github.com/features/copilot | "Your AI pair programmer" | +| GitHub Blog | github.blog (June 2025) | "From pair to peer programmer" | +| Microsoft Visual Studio | visualstudio.microsoft.com/github-copilot | Official docs | +| Microsoft Learn | learn.microsoft.com/training/paths/copilot | Training courses | + +### Human-in-the-Loop +| Source | URL | Notes | +|--------|-----|-------| +| Atlassian HULA | atlassian.com/blog/atlassian-engineering/hula-blog | ICSE 2025 paper | +| arXiv 2411.12924 | arxiv.org/abs/2411.12924 | HULA framework paper | +| Google Cloud | cloud.google.com/discover/human-in-the-loop | Official definition | +| Google Developers Blog | developers.googleblog.com | A2A protocol with HITL | + +### TDD + AI +| Source | URL | Notes | +|--------|-----|-------| +| Qodo.ai | qodo.ai/blog/ai-code-assistants-test-driven-development | AWS SA author | +| Builder.io | builder.io/blog/test-driven-development-ai | Practical guide | +| GitHub Blog | github.blog (May 2025) | "TDD with GitHub Copilot" | +| Substack | ecosystem4engineering.substack.com | "TDD in Age of AI" | + +--- + +## Interview Questions + +Questions for Oleg to capture Henry's authentic voice: + +### Vibe Coding +- Ты когда-нибудь работал в режиме vibe coding? Что получилось? +- Когда это уместно, когда нет? + +### Spec-Driven Development +- Пробовал GitHub Spec Kit или писать spec перед кодом? +- Твоё мнение — это будущее или overkill? + +### Agentic Coding +- Как используешь Claude Code? Даёшь автономию или контролируешь каждый шаг? +- Что доверяешь агенту, что нет? + +### AI Pair Programming +- Copilot/Cursor — как pair programmer или просто autocomplete? +- Реально ли это "парное программирование"? + +### Human-in-the-Loop +- Как часто AI делает что-то без твоего одобрения? +- Где граница доверия? + +### TDD + AI +- Пишешь тесты первыми при работе с AI? +- Работает ли классический TDD с генеративным AI? + +--- + +## Henry's Opinions (from interview) + +*Will be filled during interview session* + +### On Vibe Coding +[pending] + +### On Spec-Driven Development +[pending] + +### On Agentic Coding +[pending] + +### On AI Pair Programming +[pending] + +### On Human-in-the-Loop +[pending] + +### On TDD + AI +[pending] + +--- + +*Updated: 2026-01-22* diff --git a/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/seo-metadata.md b/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/seo-metadata.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c02d67d --- /dev/null +++ b/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/seo-metadata.md @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +# SEO Metadata + +*pending — will be created after keyword research* + +## Title +[TBD] + +## Meta Description +[TBD] + +## Target Keywords +- Primary: [TBD] +- Secondary: [TBD] + +## URL Slug +beyond-vibe-coding diff --git a/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/text.md b/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/text.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..331baa2 --- /dev/null +++ b/assets/beyond-vibe-coding/text.md @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +# Article Text + +*pending — will be written after outline approval*