feat: add research
This commit is contained in:
parent
02b1382dcc
commit
357c1c4cc9
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
slug: claude-code-image-generation-mcp
|
||||||
|
title: "How to Generate Images in Claude Code with MCP"
|
||||||
|
status: inbox
|
||||||
|
created: 2024-12-24
|
||||||
|
source: research
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Idea
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Discovery
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Source:** Cursor Forum feature requests, GitHub issues, Replicate MCP launch
|
||||||
|
**Evidence:**
|
||||||
|
- Multiple feature requests on Cursor forum for image generation integration
|
||||||
|
- GitHub issue: "Why can't claude code analyze images?"
|
||||||
|
- Replicate launched MCP but lacks good tutorials
|
||||||
|
- FluxGen Product Hunt launch validates market need
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Why This Matters
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Search intent exists** — developers actively searching for this
|
||||||
|
2. **Replicate gap** — they launched MCP but documentation is technical, not tutorial
|
||||||
|
3. **Pain point validated** — multiple sources confirm context-switching frustration
|
||||||
|
4. **SEO opportunity** — "claude code image generation" likely low competition
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Potential Angle
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Step-by-step tutorial:
|
||||||
|
1. What is MCP and why it matters for image generation
|
||||||
|
2. Setting up an MCP server for image generation
|
||||||
|
3. Example: generating hero images from Claude Code
|
||||||
|
4. Example: creating placeholder images automatically
|
||||||
|
5. Banatie as recommended solution (built-in CDN, consistency)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Include:
|
||||||
|
- Code snippets for mcp.json configuration
|
||||||
|
- Real examples with prompts
|
||||||
|
- Before/after workflow comparison
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Keywords
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- claude code image generation
|
||||||
|
- mcp image generation
|
||||||
|
- claude code mcp tutorial
|
||||||
|
- ai coding image workflow
|
||||||
|
- generate images without leaving ide
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Notes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Competitor content audit: Pascal Poredda has slash commands article — differentiate by focusing on MCP server setup
|
||||||
|
- Consider video walkthrough for YouTube
|
||||||
|
- Cross-post to Dev.to
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
slug: replicate-mcp-vs-dedicated-image-api
|
||||||
|
title: "Replicate MCP vs Dedicated Image APIs: What Developers Should Know"
|
||||||
|
status: inbox
|
||||||
|
created: 2024-12-24
|
||||||
|
source: research
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Idea
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Discovery
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Source:** Replicate MCP launch (mcp.replicate.com), competitive analysis
|
||||||
|
**Evidence:**
|
||||||
|
- Replicate launched full MCP integration December 2024
|
||||||
|
- Generic platform approach vs specialized tools
|
||||||
|
- No built-in CDN, project organization, or consistency features
|
||||||
|
- Complex per-model pricing
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Why This Matters
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Timely** — Replicate just launched, developers evaluating options
|
||||||
|
2. **Positioning** — establishes Banatie differentiation
|
||||||
|
3. **SEO** — "replicate mcp" searches will increase
|
||||||
|
4. **Authority** — shows deep market understanding
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Potential Angle
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Honest comparison:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**When Replicate MCP makes sense:**
|
||||||
|
- Need multiple model types (not just images)
|
||||||
|
- Want model flexibility and experimentation
|
||||||
|
- Building ML-focused product
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**When dedicated image API makes sense:**
|
||||||
|
- Image generation is core workflow
|
||||||
|
- Need CDN/delivery built-in
|
||||||
|
- Want project organization
|
||||||
|
- Need consistency across images (@name refs)
|
||||||
|
- Predictable pricing
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Include:
|
||||||
|
- Pricing comparison table
|
||||||
|
- Setup complexity comparison
|
||||||
|
- Feature matrix
|
||||||
|
- Use case recommendations
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Keywords
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- replicate mcp
|
||||||
|
- replicate vs cloudinary
|
||||||
|
- image generation api comparison
|
||||||
|
- replicate alternative
|
||||||
|
- mcp image generation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Notes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Don't bash Replicate — they're well-funded, respected
|
||||||
|
- Focus on "right tool for the job" angle
|
||||||
|
- Include code examples for both
|
||||||
|
- Fair comparison builds trust
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
|
||||||
|
# Competitor Analysis: Replicate MCP
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Date:** 2024-12-24
|
||||||
|
**URL:** https://mcp.replicate.com, https://replicate.com/docs/reference/mcp
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Overview
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Replicate launched a full MCP (Model Context Protocol) server integration, allowing developers to use their platform directly from Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, and other MCP-compatible tools. This is a significant competitive development for Banatie.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Recent Activity
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Launched remote MCP server (hosted at mcp.replicate.com)
|
||||||
|
- Released npm package for local MCP server (replicate-mcp)
|
||||||
|
- Documentation at replicate.com/docs/reference/mcp
|
||||||
|
- Works with Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Continue
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## MCP Server Features
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Tools provided:**
|
||||||
|
- `search_models` — Search for models on Replicate
|
||||||
|
- `create_predictions` — Generate images/other media
|
||||||
|
- `list_hardware` — View available hardware options
|
||||||
|
- Code mode (experimental) — Execute TypeScript in Deno sandbox
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Setup methods:**
|
||||||
|
1. Remote server (recommended, easy): Just add URL to Claude/Cursor config
|
||||||
|
2. Local server: Install via npm, configure API token
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Example natural language prompts:**
|
||||||
|
- "Search Replicate for upscaler models and compare them"
|
||||||
|
- "Generate an image using black-forest-labs/flux-schnell"
|
||||||
|
- "Show me the latest Replicate models created by @fofr"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Strengths
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **First mover in MCP** — Live and documented before Banatie
|
||||||
|
- **Established brand** — Known platform, trusted by developers
|
||||||
|
- **Model variety** — Access to thousands of models, not just images
|
||||||
|
- **Good documentation** — Clear setup instructions
|
||||||
|
- **Remote server option** — No local setup required
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Weaknesses (Banatie Opportunities)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **Generic platform** — Not optimized for image workflow specifically
|
||||||
|
- **No built-in CDN** — Images returned as URLs, no delivery optimization
|
||||||
|
- **No project organization** — Images not organized by project
|
||||||
|
- **Complex pricing** — Varies by model, hard to predict costs
|
||||||
|
- **No prompt enhancement** — Raw prompts only
|
||||||
|
- **No consistency features** — No @name references for style consistency
|
||||||
|
- **No auto-file management** — Images need manual download/organization
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Content Strategy
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
What they publish:
|
||||||
|
- Technical documentation
|
||||||
|
- Blog posts about new models
|
||||||
|
- "Replicate Intelligence" newsletter (weekly)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Gaps for Banatie content:
|
||||||
|
- Tutorial-style content (they have docs, not tutorials)
|
||||||
|
- Workflow optimization content
|
||||||
|
- "Solve the pain" content vs "feature announcements"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pricing
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Per-model pricing, varies significantly:
|
||||||
|
- FLUX schnell: ~$0.003 per image
|
||||||
|
- SDXL: ~$0.01+ per image
|
||||||
|
- More complex models: higher
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No bundled pricing, no predictable monthly cost.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Our Differentiation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Image-specific optimization** — Built for images, not generic ML
|
||||||
|
2. **Built-in CDN** — Fast global delivery included
|
||||||
|
3. **Project organization** — Automatic organization by project
|
||||||
|
4. **Consistency features** — @name references for consistent style
|
||||||
|
5. **Prompt enhancement** — AI improves prompts automatically
|
||||||
|
6. **Predictable pricing** — Monthly subscription, clear limits
|
||||||
|
7. **Developer DX** — Simpler API for common image use cases
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Recommended Response
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Accelerate MCP launch** — They have first-mover advantage
|
||||||
|
2. **Differentiate clearly** — Don't compete on model count, compete on workflow
|
||||||
|
3. **Content opportunity** — Create better tutorials than their docs
|
||||||
|
4. **Positioning** — "For developers who need images" vs "For ML engineers"
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
||||||
|
# Pain Point: Context Switching for Image Generation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Quote:** "As a developer, I constantly found myself jumping between my code editor (like Cursor, VSC, or Windsurf) and design tools just to create simple images or visuals for my projects. It was a flow killer."
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Source:** FluxGen Product Hunt launch
|
||||||
|
**Engagement:** Product Hunt launch, active comments
|
||||||
|
**Date:** 2024-03-31
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This quote comes from the maker of FluxGen, a new tool specifically designed to solve the image generation workflow problem for Cursor users. The fact that someone built and launched a product to solve this exact pain validates Banatie's thesis.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Additional evidence from Cursor Forum:
|
||||||
|
- Multiple feature requests for DALL-E/Stable Diffusion integration
|
||||||
|
- Feature request: "Generate AI Images for UI Design Suggestions with Code Integration"
|
||||||
|
- Request for "Create a dog-themed image placeholder for a landing section, save it to /assets/placeholders/, and link it in the Hero.tsx component"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pain Point Analysis
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**The problem:**
|
||||||
|
1. Developer working in IDE (Cursor, VS Code, Claude Code)
|
||||||
|
2. Needs an image for project (hero, placeholder, asset)
|
||||||
|
3. Must leave IDE → open image generator → generate → download → organize → import
|
||||||
|
4. Flow broken, context lost, time wasted
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Why it matters:**
|
||||||
|
- Developers optimize for flow state
|
||||||
|
- Context switching has real productivity cost
|
||||||
|
- Manual file management is tedious
|
||||||
|
- Problem compounds across many images per project
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Content Opportunity
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Article:** "Stop Context-Switching: Generate Images Without Leaving Your Editor"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Angle:**
|
||||||
|
- Quantify the pain (time lost per context switch)
|
||||||
|
- Show the traditional workflow vs MCP workflow
|
||||||
|
- Banatie as solution
|
||||||
|
- Include timing comparison
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Keywords:**
|
||||||
|
- ai coding workflow
|
||||||
|
- cursor image generation
|
||||||
|
- developer productivity
|
||||||
|
- context switching programming
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Banatie Relevance
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This is the core pain point Banatie solves:
|
||||||
|
- MCP integration = generate from editor
|
||||||
|
- Built-in CDN = no manual upload
|
||||||
|
- Project organization = no manual file management
|
||||||
|
- Prompt URLs = even simpler for templates
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Content should emphasize workflow, not features.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
|
||||||
|
# Weekly Intelligence Digest: 2024-12-24
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Executive Summary
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Critical finding:** Replicate launched full MCP integration — now directly competing with Banatie's planned MCP server. They offer Claude Code, Cursor, and VS Code integration with image generation models. This is the biggest competitive development this quarter.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Secondary findings: FluxGen (new competitor) launched on Product Hunt targeting Cursor developers. Runware expanded to 400k+ models and multi-modal (video, audio). Multiple feature requests on Cursor forum confirm strong demand for integrated image generation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Competitor Activity
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Competitor | Activity | Impact | Our Response |
|
||||||
|
|------------|----------|--------|--------------|
|
||||||
|
| **Replicate** | Launched MCP server (mcp.replicate.com) | HIGH — Direct competition | Accelerate MCP launch, differentiate on DX |
|
||||||
|
| **Runware** | Expanded to 400k+ models, multi-modal | MEDIUM — Still no MCP | Focus on workflow, not model count |
|
||||||
|
| **FluxGen** | Launched on Product Hunt for Cursor | MEDIUM — Validates market | Content opportunity, positioning |
|
||||||
|
| **xAI** | Aurora image generation API | LOW — Enterprise focus | Monitor |
|
||||||
|
| **OpenAI** | GPT Image 1.5 API, 4x faster | MEDIUM — Generic API | Not workflow-focused |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Replicate MCP Deep Dive
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**URL:** https://mcp.replicate.com
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**What they launched:**
|
||||||
|
- Remote MCP server (hosted, easy setup)
|
||||||
|
- Local MCP server (npm package)
|
||||||
|
- Works with Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor
|
||||||
|
- Tools: search_models, create_predictions, list_hardware
|
||||||
|
- Natural language prompts: "Generate an image using black-forest-labs/flux-schnell"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Their weaknesses (Banatie opportunity):**
|
||||||
|
- Generic platform, not image-specific
|
||||||
|
- No built-in CDN
|
||||||
|
- No project organization
|
||||||
|
- Complex pricing (per-model)
|
||||||
|
- No prompt enhancement
|
||||||
|
- No @name consistency references
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Source:** https://replicate.com/docs/reference/mcp
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### FluxGen — New Direct Competitor
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**URL:** Product Hunt launch
|
||||||
|
**Positioning:** "AI Image Generator for Cursor"
|
||||||
|
**Tagline:** "Generate AI Images Without Breaking Your Code Flow"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Quote from maker:**
|
||||||
|
> "As a developer, I constantly found myself jumping between my code editor and design tools just to create simple images or visuals for my projects. It was a flow killer."
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Analysis:** This validates Banatie's thesis. Developer is solving own pain point — same as Oleg. Watch for traction.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pain Points Discovered
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 1. Image Generation in Cursor — Feature Requests
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Source:** Cursor Forum (multiple threads)
|
||||||
|
**Engagement:** Active discussion, multiple upvotes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Quotes:**
|
||||||
|
- "Is there any plan to integrate Cursor AI with image generation models like DALL-E 3 or Stable Diffusion?"
|
||||||
|
- "It would be amazing if AI could generate images on the fly for websites"
|
||||||
|
- "Create a dog-themed image placeholder for a landing section, save it to /assets/placeholders/, and link it in the Hero.tsx component"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Content angle:** Tutorial showing how to do this with MCP + Banatie
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 2. Claude Code Image Workflow Friction
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Source:** GitHub Issues, Community forums
|
||||||
|
**Problem:** Developers can analyze images but can't generate them natively
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Quote:**
|
||||||
|
> "Bug Description: Why can't claude code analyze images? If i upload path it says it can't and i need to use web interface."
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Content angle:** "How to Generate Images in Claude Code" tutorial
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 3. Context Switching Pain
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Source:** Product Hunt FluxGen launch, Cursor Forum
|
||||||
|
**Problem:** Leaving IDE to generate images breaks flow
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Quote (FluxGen maker):**
|
||||||
|
> "I constantly found myself jumping between my code editor (like Cursor, VSC, or Windsurf) and design tools just to create simple images or visuals for my projects. It was a flow killer."
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Content angle:** Productivity article on workflow optimization
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Content Opportunities (Prioritized)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### High Priority
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **"How to Generate Images in Claude Code with MCP"**
|
||||||
|
- Why: High search intent, Replicate doesn't have good tutorials
|
||||||
|
- Angle: Banatie MCP as featured solution
|
||||||
|
- Keywords: claude code image generation, mcp image generation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. **"Replicate MCP vs Dedicated Image APIs: What Developers Should Know"**
|
||||||
|
- Why: Capitalize on Replicate launch, position Banatie
|
||||||
|
- Angle: Comparison showing Banatie advantages
|
||||||
|
- Keywords: replicate mcp, image generation api comparison
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
3. **"Stop Context-Switching: Generate Images Without Leaving Your Editor"**
|
||||||
|
- Why: Pain point validation from multiple sources
|
||||||
|
- Angle: Problem-solution with Banatie
|
||||||
|
- Keywords: cursor image generation, ai coding workflow
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Medium Priority
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
4. **"Setting Up Image Generation in Cursor (Complete Guide)"**
|
||||||
|
- Tutorial format, SEO-focused
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
5. **"AI Image APIs Comparison 2024: Runware vs Replicate vs [Others]"**
|
||||||
|
- Establishes authority, attracts comparison shoppers
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Trends
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### MCP Adoption Accelerating
|
||||||
|
- Replicate, Hugging Face, and others launching MCP servers
|
||||||
|
- Claude Code and Cursor both support MCP
|
||||||
|
- Becoming standard for AI tool integration
|
||||||
|
- **Implication:** MCP server is table stakes, not differentiator
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Developer-Focused Image Tools Emerging
|
||||||
|
- FluxGen (Cursor-specific)
|
||||||
|
- Pascal Poredda's slash commands for image generation
|
||||||
|
- Multiple DIY solutions appearing
|
||||||
|
- **Implication:** Market is ready, but fragmented solutions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Multi-Modal Expansion
|
||||||
|
- Runware: image → video → audio → text
|
||||||
|
- Replicate: same trajectory
|
||||||
|
- **Implication:** Consider video generation as future feature
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Recommended Actions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [ ] **Urgent:** Accelerate MCP server development — Replicate has first-mover advantage
|
||||||
|
- [ ] **This week:** Create "How to Generate Images in Claude Code" article (capitalize on search intent)
|
||||||
|
- [ ] **This week:** Research FluxGen — pricing, features, traction
|
||||||
|
- [ ] **Soon:** Define differentiation from Replicate MCP (CDN, project org, consistency)
|
||||||
|
- [ ] **Content:** Start comparison content strategy (SEO for "vs" keywords)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Sources
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- https://mcp.replicate.com/
|
||||||
|
- https://replicate.com/docs/reference/mcp
|
||||||
|
- https://runware.ai/
|
||||||
|
- https://forum.cursor.com/t/feature-suggestion-cursor-ai-integration-with-image-generation-models-dall-e-stable-diffusion/64198
|
||||||
|
- https://github.com/cursor/cursor/issues/3111
|
||||||
|
- https://www.producthunt.com/products/fluxgen-ai-image-generator-for-cursor
|
||||||
|
- https://www.pascal-poredda.com/blog/claude-code-image-generation-with-custom-cmds
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue