fix: remove analytics
This commit is contained in:
parent
fa06cfb1df
commit
6192a4104b
70
ROADMAP.md
70
ROADMAP.md
|
|
@ -218,76 +218,6 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📊 Research Insights Summary
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Direction 2 (AI Coding Agents) ⭐ VALIDATED
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**🟢 Strong Signals:**
|
|
||||||
- Massive user base (36K+ r/cursor members)
|
|
||||||
- Stock photos pain (generic, overused)
|
|
||||||
- Willingness to pay ($20-200/mo for AI tools)
|
|
||||||
- Manual Midjourney workflow tedious
|
|
||||||
- Aspect ratio limitations
|
|
||||||
- Image optimization time-consuming
|
|
||||||
- Paid MCP business model works
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**ICP Match:** 70-80% confidence
|
|
||||||
- Founder IS the ICP (uses Claude Code)
|
|
||||||
- Technical fit = perfect (MCP + SDK)
|
|
||||||
- Market size = huge
|
|
||||||
- Fast to revenue
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Direction 1 (Agencies) - Secondary
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**🟢 Signals:**
|
|
||||||
- "Placeholder hell" validated
|
|
||||||
- Client approval blocked without realistic images
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**⚠️ Concerns:**
|
|
||||||
- ICP mismatch (agencies ≠ validated audience)
|
|
||||||
- Unclear if AI solves approval problem
|
|
||||||
- Longer sales cycle (B2B)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Direction 6 (E-commerce) - Parking Lot
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**🟢 Signals:**
|
|
||||||
- Huge market ($50B product photography)
|
|
||||||
- Clear use case (1 photo → 100 variations)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**🔴 Problems:**
|
|
||||||
- ICP mismatch (no-code preference)
|
|
||||||
- Free tier competition (16K-31K images/month FREE)
|
|
||||||
- Pivot required (3-6 months)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🎯 Validated ICP Segments (A/B/C/D)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**A) Studios/Agencies - Decision Maker**
|
|
||||||
- CEO/Founder/Manager in 3-10 person team
|
|
||||||
- Higher ACV ($149/mo potential)
|
|
||||||
- Longer sales cycle
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**B) Power Users - Tech Champion** ⭐ PRIMARY
|
|
||||||
- Tech leads using Cursor/Claude Code
|
|
||||||
- Already pay $20-200/mo for AI tools
|
|
||||||
- Fast decision, can influence team adoption
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**C) Freelancers - Solo Decision**
|
|
||||||
- Most price-sensitive
|
|
||||||
- Fast decision (no approval needed)
|
|
||||||
- Credits > subscription preference
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**D) AI-Savvy Freelancers - Power Solo** ⭐ SECONDARY
|
|
||||||
- Active AI tool users (Cursor, ChatGPT)
|
|
||||||
- High project volume
|
|
||||||
- Time = money mindset
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Technical Product:** SAME for all segments
|
|
||||||
- Differences only in GTM (messaging, pricing emphasis, channels)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 🔮 Future Milestones (After Validation)
|
## 🔮 Future Milestones (After Validation)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Post-Validation Phase (1-2 weeks after GO)
|
### Post-Validation Phase (1-2 weeks after GO)
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -150,11 +150,6 @@ This folder contains all passive research conducted to validate ICP hypotheses f
|
||||||
**Technical Product:** SAME for all segments
|
**Technical Product:** SAME for all segments
|
||||||
**GTM Strategy:** DIFFERS by segment (messaging, pricing emphasis, channels)
|
**GTM Strategy:** DIFFERS by segment (messaging, pricing emphasis, channels)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Confidence Ranking:**
|
|
||||||
1. 🥇 Direction 2 (AI Coding Agents) - 70-80% - GO for interviews
|
|
||||||
2. 🥈 Direction 1 (Agencies) - 60-70% - Secondary exploration
|
|
||||||
3. 🥉 Direction 6 (E-commerce) - 30-40% - Parking lot
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 📈 Research Outcomes & Next Steps
|
## 📈 Research Outcomes & Next Steps
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue