104 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
104 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
# Banatie Research Directions Tracker - Extension 1
|
|
|
|
**Date Created:** November 1, 2025
|
|
**Purpose:** Additional deep-dive directions from Direction 6 findings
|
|
**Status:** Ready for research
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Why These Extensions
|
|
|
|
**From Direction 6 Discovery:** E-commerce and NoCode communities heavily use Nano Banana for production workflows. Both represent large potential markets but need separate investigation to understand if they're viable ICPs for Banatie.
|
|
|
|
**E-commerce (Direction 11):** $50B market, clear use case (product variations), but prefer no-code tools. Need to validate if there's room for better solution and willingness to pay.
|
|
|
|
**NoCode (Direction 12):** Active n8n community building workflows, but using free tier + DIY. Need to understand pain points and whether code-based alternative or better infrastructure can compete.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🎯 Direction 11: E-commerce Product Photography
|
|
|
|
### Hypothesis
|
|
E-commerce businesses need scalable product image variations (backgrounds, colors, settings) for multi-channel marketing. Current n8n + free tier works but lacks production features we can monetize.
|
|
|
|
### Strong Signals Already Found (Direction 6)
|
|
- Multiple n8n workflows generating 20-100 ad variations from 1 product photo
|
|
- "$50B Product Photography Industry" mentioned in r/n8n threads
|
|
- UGC ads generated for <$1 each (vs $50-500 for real influencers)
|
|
- Excel → WooCommerce automated pipelines actively used in production
|
|
- AutoProductImagery Docker solution exists (self-hosted + Google API)
|
|
- Adobe Firefly validation (enterprise quality confirmed)
|
|
|
|
### Key Questions
|
|
- What's typical product image workflow? How many variations per product?
|
|
- Who decides (owner, marketing manager, agency)? What's the budget?
|
|
- Pain points: Quality? Consistency? Storage? Delivery?
|
|
- Would they pay $20-100/month for better solution vs DIY?
|
|
- Agency vs direct business: Which is better ICP?
|
|
|
|
### Search Topics
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **11.1:** E-commerce product image workflows and pain points
|
|
- [ ] **11.2:** Multi-channel requirements (Amazon, Shopify, Instagram specs)
|
|
- [ ] **11.3:** Product photography costs and ROI perception
|
|
- [ ] **11.4:** AI product photography tools (competitor analysis)
|
|
- [ ] **11.5:** Shopify/WooCommerce image management frustrations
|
|
- [ ] **11.6:** Amazon seller image needs (7 images, A+ content)
|
|
- [ ] **11.7:** Marketing agency workflows serving e-commerce clients
|
|
|
|
### Findings
|
|
- (To be filled after searches)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🎯 Direction 12: NoCode Automation Builders
|
|
|
|
### Hypothesis
|
|
NoCode users (n8n, Make, Zapier) build image generation workflows but face limitations with free tier + DIY approach. There may be demand for better infrastructure or code-based alternative.
|
|
|
|
### Strong Signals Already Found (Direction 6)
|
|
- n8n community very active with Nano Banana production workflows
|
|
- OpenRouter free tier: 50 images/day, Google AI Studio: 500-1,000/day
|
|
- "Zero Dollars" workflows enable small-medium businesses to operate free
|
|
- AutoProductImagery self-hosted solution (Docker) available
|
|
- Community shares copy-paste workflow templates
|
|
- Free tier "not meant for production" per Google TOS, but widely used
|
|
|
|
### Key Questions
|
|
- Who uses n8n/Make for image generation? Skill level? Use cases?
|
|
- Pain points: Rate limits? Quality? Complexity? Debugging?
|
|
- Do technical users want code alternative to visual workflows?
|
|
- Would they pay for "better than free tier" solution?
|
|
- What features missing in current n8n + API approach?
|
|
|
|
### Search Topics
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **12.1:** n8n image generation use cases (beyond e-commerce)
|
|
- [ ] **12.2:** n8n + Nano Banana pain points and limitations
|
|
- [ ] **12.3:** Make.com & Zapier image automation patterns
|
|
- [ ] **12.4:** NoCode builder frustrations (when users want code)
|
|
- [ ] **12.5:** Self-hosted automation needs and priorities
|
|
- [ ] **12.6:** Visual workflow vs code preference among technical users
|
|
- [ ] **12.7:** Image generation API comparisons and switching reasons
|
|
|
|
### Findings
|
|
- (To be filled after searches)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🚦 Decision Framework
|
|
|
|
**After researching Direction 11 + Direction 12, decide:**
|
|
|
|
- **IF Direction 11 🟢:** Build e-commerce solution (Shopify app, agency tool, or API)
|
|
- **IF Direction 12 🟢:** Build for NoCode users (n8n node, visual builder, or SDK)
|
|
- **IF BOTH 🟢:** Build e-commerce-focused NoCode solution (hybrid)
|
|
- **IF BOTH 🔴:** Return to AI Developers ICP (original validated plan)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**Status:** Ready for research
|
|
**Priority:** Direction 11 (E-commerce) first, then Direction 12 (NoCode)
|
|
**Estimated time:** 1-2 hours per direction
|
|
|