4.5 KiB
Banatie Research Directions Tracker - Extension 1
Date Created: November 1, 2025
Purpose: Additional deep-dive directions from Direction 6 findings
Status: Ready for research
Why These Extensions
From Direction 6 Discovery: E-commerce and NoCode communities heavily use Nano Banana for production workflows. Both represent large potential markets but need separate investigation to understand if they're viable ICPs for Banatie.
E-commerce (Direction 11): $50B market, clear use case (product variations), but prefer no-code tools. Need to validate if there's room for better solution and willingness to pay.
NoCode (Direction 12): Active n8n community building workflows, but using free tier + DIY. Need to understand pain points and whether code-based alternative or better infrastructure can compete.
🎯 Direction 11: E-commerce Product Photography
Hypothesis
E-commerce businesses need scalable product image variations (backgrounds, colors, settings) for multi-channel marketing. Current n8n + free tier works but lacks production features we can monetize.
Strong Signals Already Found (Direction 6)
- Multiple n8n workflows generating 20-100 ad variations from 1 product photo
- "$50B Product Photography Industry" mentioned in r/n8n threads
- UGC ads generated for <$1 each (vs $50-500 for real influencers)
- Excel → WooCommerce automated pipelines actively used in production
- AutoProductImagery Docker solution exists (self-hosted + Google API)
- Adobe Firefly validation (enterprise quality confirmed)
Key Questions
- What's typical product image workflow? How many variations per product?
- Who decides (owner, marketing manager, agency)? What's the budget?
- Pain points: Quality? Consistency? Storage? Delivery?
- Would they pay $20-100/month for better solution vs DIY?
- Agency vs direct business: Which is better ICP?
Search Topics
- 11.1: E-commerce product image workflows and pain points
- 11.2: Multi-channel requirements (Amazon, Shopify, Instagram specs)
- 11.3: Product photography costs and ROI perception
- 11.4: AI product photography tools (competitor analysis)
- 11.5: Shopify/WooCommerce image management frustrations
- 11.6: Amazon seller image needs (7 images, A+ content)
- 11.7: Marketing agency workflows serving e-commerce clients
Findings
- (To be filled after searches)
🎯 Direction 12: NoCode Automation Builders
Hypothesis
NoCode users (n8n, Make, Zapier) build image generation workflows but face limitations with free tier + DIY approach. There may be demand for better infrastructure or code-based alternative.
Strong Signals Already Found (Direction 6)
- n8n community very active with Nano Banana production workflows
- OpenRouter free tier: 50 images/day, Google AI Studio: 500-1,000/day
- "Zero Dollars" workflows enable small-medium businesses to operate free
- AutoProductImagery self-hosted solution (Docker) available
- Community shares copy-paste workflow templates
- Free tier "not meant for production" per Google TOS, but widely used
Key Questions
- Who uses n8n/Make for image generation? Skill level? Use cases?
- Pain points: Rate limits? Quality? Complexity? Debugging?
- Do technical users want code alternative to visual workflows?
- Would they pay for "better than free tier" solution?
- What features missing in current n8n + API approach?
Search Topics
- 12.1: n8n image generation use cases (beyond e-commerce)
- 12.2: n8n + Nano Banana pain points and limitations
- 12.3: Make.com & Zapier image automation patterns
- 12.4: NoCode builder frustrations (when users want code)
- 12.5: Self-hosted automation needs and priorities
- 12.6: Visual workflow vs code preference among technical users
- 12.7: Image generation API comparisons and switching reasons
Findings
- (To be filled after searches)
🚦 Decision Framework
After researching Direction 11 + Direction 12, decide:
- IF Direction 11 🟢: Build e-commerce solution (Shopify app, agency tool, or API)
- IF Direction 12 🟢: Build for NoCode users (n8n node, visual builder, or SDK)
- IF BOTH 🟢: Build e-commerce-focused NoCode solution (hybrid)
- IF BOTH 🔴: Return to AI Developers ICP (original validated plan)
Status: Ready for research
Priority: Direction 11 (E-commerce) first, then Direction 12 (NoCode)
Estimated time: 1-2 hours per direction