131 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
131 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
# Competitive Analysis
|
|
|
|
**Date:** November 2, 2025
|
|
**Status:** ✅ Updated with Runware + ImageKit research
|
|
**Version:** 1.0
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Key Competitors
|
|
|
|
### Runware AI ($13M funding)
|
|
- **Price:** $0.0006/image (166x cheaper than us)
|
|
- **Positioning:** Infrastructure play (AWS approach)
|
|
- **Target:** High-volume, price-sensitive buyers
|
|
- **Gaps:** No prompt enhancement, no consistency, REST only
|
|
|
|
### ImageKit.io (Enterprise scale)
|
|
- **Price:** $0.10-0.25/image effective
|
|
- **Feature:** URL-based generation (validates Prompt URLs concept)
|
|
- **Target:** E-commerce, marketing teams
|
|
- **Gaps:** No prompt enhancement, no @references, no developer tools
|
|
|
|
### Inference Infrastructure (Commodity)
|
|
- fal.ai: $0.028/image
|
|
- Replicate: $0.03/image
|
|
- Together.ai: Similar
|
|
- **Positioning:** Raw compute, no pipeline
|
|
|
|
### Manual Tools
|
|
- Midjourney: $0.05/image, Discord workflow, no API
|
|
- DALL-E: Via OpenAI, no consistency
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Our Competitive Advantages
|
|
|
|
### 1. Prompt Enhancement (PRIMARY MOAT)
|
|
- Generic → Professional quality
|
|
- 3-6 months to replicate
|
|
- Always enabled, not optional
|
|
- This is what justifies $0.10 vs $0.0006
|
|
|
|
### 2. Consistency System (@references)
|
|
- Style/object persistence across generations
|
|
- Unique feature, no competitor has this
|
|
- Post-MVP (needs validation)
|
|
|
|
### 3. Production Pipeline
|
|
- CDN delivery included
|
|
- 6 aspect ratios built-in
|
|
- Transformations (with focal point detection)
|
|
- Zero manual work
|
|
|
|
### 4. Developer Experience
|
|
- MCP (Cursor/Claude Code)
|
|
- SDK (programmatic)
|
|
- CLI (terminal)
|
|
- Prompt URLs (universal)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Positioning vs Competitors
|
|
|
|
**NOT competing on price:**
|
|
- Runware = infrastructure ($0.0006)
|
|
- Us = DX premium ($0.10)
|
|
|
|
**Analogy:**
|
|
- Runware = AWS S3 (cheap storage)
|
|
- Us = Vercel (developer experience)
|
|
|
|
**Effective cost comparison:**
|
|
|
|
| Solution | List Price | Hidden Costs | Effective Total |
|
|
|----------|-----------|--------------|-----------------|
|
|
| Runware | $0.0006 | CDN setup, transformations, prompting, 10 min manual | $4-25/image |
|
|
| Banatie | $0.10 | Zero | $0.10/image |
|
|
|
|
**Target different buyers:**
|
|
- Runware: Infrastructure teams, volume buyers
|
|
- ImageKit: E-commerce, marketing teams
|
|
- Banatie: AI developers, web agencies
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Why We Win
|
|
|
|
### vs Runware:
|
|
- Quality layer (enhancement)
|
|
- Complete solution (not just generation)
|
|
- Developer workflow (MCP, SDK, CLI)
|
|
|
|
### vs ImageKit:
|
|
- Developer-first (not marketing-first)
|
|
- Prompt enhancement (not generic)
|
|
- @references consistency (unique)
|
|
|
|
### vs Midjourney:
|
|
- Automation (API vs Discord)
|
|
- Integration (MCP vs manual)
|
|
- Speed (instant vs 5-10 min workflow)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Free Tier Strategy
|
|
|
|
**NOT competing with free:**
|
|
- OpenRouter: 50/day free
|
|
- Google AI Studio: 500-1000/day free
|
|
- Combined: 16K-31K/month free
|
|
|
|
**Our free tier = testing only:**
|
|
- 10 images/month with watermark
|
|
- All features included
|
|
- Goal: Prove quality, convert to paid
|
|
|
|
**Paid tier = production use:**
|
|
- Data privacy (not used for training)
|
|
- Professional quality (enhancement)
|
|
- Production features (CDN, transformations)
|
|
- Support
|
|
|
|
**Messaging:**
|
|
> "Free tier = hobby projects, generic quality.
|
|
> Paid tier = professional work, client-ready quality."
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**Last updated:** November 2, 2025
|
|
**Next review:** After 10 customer interviews
|